
No need for more comment, Pooch Dog says...
Low-life humanoid types, bow down low before the presence of the great Pooch Doggy Dog!

President-elect Barack Obama's pledge to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which "seeks to codify Roe v. Wade into federal law," is "setting up a showdown with the Vatican" and will "trigger a harsh response" from Pope Benedict XVI and "political revolt among practicing American Catholics," columnist Jeffery Kuhner writes in a Washington Times opinion piece.


Ol Soup Hound just ran into this Wired magazine article about the breeding changes that have drastically modified the traditional Thanksgiving food. The topic is past due. But, it's pretty amazing! You should read this article anyway. Here's some tidbits...


OPEKA, Kan. – Police are looking for a woman who used what's believed to have been hairspray as a weapon in a botched purse-snatching in a Wal-Mart parking lot. Police said the would-be thief on Saturday night first asked a 25-year-old shopper for directions, then sprayed the woman in the eyes as she tried to take her purse from her shoulder. But the shopper held on to the purse, and the woman fled empty-handed to a maroon minivan parked nearby. The victim suffered minor injuries to her face.

ROCKLAND, Mass. – Lifelong Red Sox fans can now take their love of the team to the next level — eternity. A Massachusetts funeral home recently took delivery of the first Red Sox casket, which features the team logo on the exterior as well as the inside.
The casket is manufactured by Eternal Image of Michigan, which has a licensing agreement with Major League Baseball.
Bob Biggins, co-director of Magoun-Biggins Funeral Home in Rockland, tells The Boston Globe families in mourning often want their loved ones buried with favorite items. In the past that's included Red Sox paraphernalia; the casket takes it to the next step.
Biggins says the family that chose the $3,000 Red Sox casket bearing serial number 0001 did not hesitate in picking it for their father.
(And, by the way, Poocher picks the pictures he wants to illustrate blogs. He isn't at all interested in your criticisms, Bostonites!)
SEDALIA, Mo. – A hunter bagged a big buck on the second day of firearms season, but the kill caused him a lot of pain. Randy Goodman, 49, said he thought two well-placed shots with his .270-caliber rifle had killed the buck on Nov. 19. Goodman said the deer looked dead to him, but seconds later the nine-point, 240-pound animal came to life. The buck rose up, knocked Goodman down and attacked him with his antlers in what the veteran hunter called "15 seconds of hell." The deer ran a short distance and went down, and died after Goodman fired two more shots. Soon Goodman started feeling dizzy and noticed his vest was soaked in blood. So he reached his truck and drove to a hospital, where he received seven staples in his scalp and was treated for a slight concussion and bruises.

With the advent of the automobile came the desire to drive fast. One place this was exemplified was in the southern Appalachians during the wild years of the Prohibition. Shooting up and down dark mountain passes with trunks full of moonshine, bootleggers souped up their cars so they could outrun the law. It seems only natural that tales of high-speed chases would encourage bootleggers to test their mettle against fellow moonshine runners in weekend races. From legendary origins like these came stock cars -- based on general automobile design but modified for speed -- and they grew in popularity with races springing up across the country. In 1948, Bill Francis Sr. founded NASCAR (National Association for Stock Car Racing) as a sanctioning body to unify the budding sport and provide a set of coalesced rules. There were few of those rules in the early days though, and in the spirit of their bootlegging predecessors, NASCAR competitors quickly began to look for ways to push the envelope. After all, if you ain't first, you're last, and in a field of fast cars and daring drivers, NASCAR teams were always looking for an edge up on the competition -- and still d o to this day. While in some cases this means blatant cheating, in others the line is a bit more blurred. A little confused? Let's take a closer look at an infamous example. Henry "Smokey" Yunick was a mechanical mastermind who had a knack for innovation. At one race, inspectors yanked the gas tank out of his racecar for a closer look -- but that didn't slow down Smokey, who proceeded to drive the car back to his garage from the track. The trick was a hefty 11-foot-long (around 3.4 meter) fuel line that could hold a whole 6 gallons (almost 23 liters) of gas [source: Yunick]. Not breaking any rules with that, right? Well after Smokey pulled that particular stunt, NASCAR was quick to add a few lines to the old rulebook. In fact, Smokey estimated that by 1970, more than half of NASCAR's rules were devoted directly to the efforts of his mechanical machinations -- according to him, a job well done[source: McGee]. On the next page, we'll take a closer look at some of the nefarious and not-so-nefarious ways of winning NASCAR races, and whether it's as easy to get away with them as it was back in the day.

You scoff at this headline at your own risk! Read the Onion.com article, and then check your credit card charges!
OK. Pooch Doggy Dog confession time. In the previous post I implied that my wife and I battle over TV remote location. Well, in actuality, we battle no more! Peace reigns like a calming balm...



Pooch Dog warns you not to flip by this post. It is from China Digital Times, about a college professor who was turned in by two students for being counterrevolutionary. Read the professor's plaintive reply from his blog below.
You must read the following translated comments added to his blog. Apparently, Chinese - or at least the "advanced" Chinese who added comments, are not as on board with openness and democracy as one would expect and desire!
Here's the article...
In relation to a previous post on CDT, two female students accused their political science professor, Yang Shiqun, of being “counterrevolutionary.” This is in line with a growing trend of bloggers and journalists(recently Chen Daojun), and now teachers (recently Guo Guanglin) being censored for their criticisms. The power of the internet is also in this story as Yang Shiqun posted his story on his blog, generating support for his cause. The Foreign Expert’s Jason Weinberg has translated the original post and comments. Yang Shiqun laments about Chinese student’s nationalism and pride over criticism, and the future of Chinese students:
It needs to be known, if this kind of thing were discovered during the late Qing dynasty, maybe people would still believe it: and to say that it occured during the republic’s “ May 4th” period, nobody would believe it. You know, young people at that time already basically accepted the concepts “democracy,” “freedom,” “human rights,” so normally we wouldn’t find this kind of strange event. Nonetheless, now, in 21st Century China and in Chinese universities, there can often be found such incredible things. Thinking about the most recent strange events found in Chinese schools, I just have a silent prayer for Chinese society and people: when will Chinese society be able to walk away from ignorance? When will Chinese education be able to get on track? When will Chinese students be able to compare well-balanced ideas?
Here is a continuation of the article, as well as some blog comments added by readers:
作者:oouiojfsd 回复日期:2008-11-25 15:31:12
放你妈的屁,呵呵
“抵制”杨老师的言论?到公安局告密,这是抵制”言论”
这俩傻逼,想的是”因言获罪”,想的是用”文字狱”把杨老师抓进牢里关起来。
居然有这么恶毒的女学生,她们家庭绝对是当官的Your mom’s farts, hehe
“Reject” Professor Yang’s speech? Go to the police and squeal, this is rejecting “speech”
These two idiots, they think they are “getting a conviction because of speech,” think they are using “character law” to get Yang into prison.
There actually are girls this evil, their families are definitely officials.作者:农村户口小学文化 回复日期:2008-11-25 16:12:17
这和文革有什么关系,
你反传统时,违背伦理道德,
。
违反公共价值观,
难道不能反对。
而且别人是通过法律途径的,有什么错吗?
说明,现在的大学生法律意识空前提高
是应当值得大大表扬的事情What’s the relationship between this and cultural revolution?
When you are anti-tradition, you breach ethics and morality.
It disobeys communal values,
So, you cannot argue against it.
Also, what is wrong with people who follow the law?
To say it clearly, contemporary college students’ legal consciousness used to be empty and has increased,
It should be something to praise highly.http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2008/12/an-alleged-counterrevolutionary-teacher’s-personal-plea/